Genesis chapter one can make sense.– Pete’s quotes
Film Review 1981-1982 by F. Maurice Speed
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
A new decade and F. Maurice Speed reviews the raw and the real, where quite a few films continued to cross boundaries. Speed does not focus on the poor language and diction in his introduction this time, but on the state of the box office in Britain and the USA, in 1980.
It is an always interesting if not fascinating exercise to look back at the films of yesteryear, which one finds in the warmly written reviews. One finds that in 1980 there were the usual ‘factory made’ films, of certain genres, that might have been of dubious or above average quality, but few over and above. There are always one’s favorites to re-examine in a new light and new ones to explore, some are a little tempting I must admit.
I observed a lack of decent (i.e. clean) films that were available, but there were a few decent ones, if not on actual viewing, but at least on appearances. The Black Stallion, Breaker Morant, Chariots of Fire, The Elephant Man, The Empire Strikes Back, Heartland, a remake of Little Lord Fauntleroy, Marigolds in August, The Mirror Crack’d, Raise the Titanic, Spiderman-The Dragon’s Challenge, Stalker, maybe even Xanadu, and perhaps Flash Gordon, the latter’s subtext would probably go over many kid’s heads. Overall, truly decent or wholesome films were slim pickings.
There are the perfunctory articles that are at least interesting if a bit drawn out, depending on your interest in Rank movies and the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which should be of interest to the dedicated film buff. Personally, I did not find these articles dry but enjoyable, historically informative, and of interest.
Finally, the sporadic nude photos in various positions may be off-putting, but my rating does not turn a blind eye to this, but is in keeping with the other very good qualities of this book.
View all my reviews
Film Review 1980-1981 by F, Maurice Speed
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Audiences at the end of the 1970’s saw a certain number of films with a general sense of propriety. There were also many leftovers from a decade of explicit films. F. Maurice Speed reviewed them all, mostly in a generous mood, although his lengthy introduction begins with his concerns over how the language in the movies of the day became less and less conscious of reserve but more condoning of four-letter words and why did producers let it stay. Even the Oscar winners of the day contained, even in films that were generally more acceptable, the profanity that the author addresses in his introduction. Speed reviews these films individually and objectively, but still with reservation on occasion. I was heartened to have such a book that did address these issues and where the reviews are from a critic with a more sensitized perspective.
I have watched quite a few of the films that contain the various “nasties” as they are called which I have considered with some reservation, but like Speed, tended to be ‘objective’ as well as critical.
In Speed’s reviews, there is, despite the need to be objective, none of the glossing over that some reviews tend to do in the name of story and social concerns, where language and other content does not seem to matter.
Of the 200-odd films on review, in short, informative, and warm prose, there are a couple of dozen that do not or probably would not cross the traditional boundaries of censorship, in alphabetical order:Continue reading
The Film Year Book 1983 by Al Clark
My rating: 5 of 5 stars
A year’s worth of short film reviews from films released in Great Britain between July 1 1981 and June 30 1982. If one is expecting films from 1983, the 1983 in the book’s title is misleading, but convenient for publishing purposes as the 1983 coincides more or less with its publishing date.